Montana is one of only a handful of states that mandates first-dollar primary TNC coverage during Period 1 — the moment a driver activates the app, the TNC's policy applies with no gap, even before a ride is accepted. This eliminates the dangerous coverage void that harms rideshare crash victims in most other states.
Montana's "not as great as" 50% fault bar and a three-year statute of limitations define the legal landscape, but the evidence preservation window for electronic trip data and driver status logs closes in weeks. Understanding exactly which insurance tier applied at the moment of the crash is what separates a full recovery from a coverage dispute that drags on for years.
Montana Code Annotated § 27-2-204 provides a three-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims — longer than most states. But the evidence timeline for rideshare cases is far shorter. Uber and Lyft maintain GPS trip data, driver period status logs, and in-app communications under standard retention schedules that may result in deletion within 30 to 90 days unless a formal litigation hold demand is served. The driver's Period 1, 2, or 3 status at the moment of the crash determines which coverage tier applies. Montana's TNC statute — MCA §§ 69-14-1001 through 69-14-1011 — mandates specific coverage levels for each period, and that determination turns entirely on timestamped trip data that disappears without immediate legal action.
Montana TNC law under MCA § 69-14-1004 mandates first-dollar primary liability coverage during Period 1 — from the moment a driver activates the TNC app until a ride is accepted. This makes Montana one of the most plaintiff-friendly rideshare states in the country: there is no coverage gap during Period 1 where an injured victim must fight through the driver's personal insurer before reaching TNC coverage. During Periods 2 and 3 — from ride acceptance through passenger drop-off — Montana requires $1,000,000 primary liability coverage from the TNC. The first-dollar Period 1 coverage alone can be decisive in cases where the driver was app-active but between rides when the crash occurred.
Montana Code Annotated § 27-1-702 applies the "not as great as" comparative fault standard: your recovery is barred if your negligence is equal to or greater than the defendant's. At exactly 50% fault, you lose everything. Montana rideshare carriers — Uber and Lyft — are acutely aware of this threshold. Their defense teams use accident reconstructionists to argue that the victim's speed, lane position, or failure to yield independently accounts for 50% or more of the crash causation. Retaining an independent reconstruction expert before Uber or Lyft's investigators have already measured skid marks and documented the physical scene is the single most important early step in a Montana rideshare case.
When a Montana state highway, county road, or municipal intersection defect contributed to the rideshare crash, claims against the Montana Department of Transportation or other governmental entities follow the Government Claims process under MCA § 2-9-301. Unlike states with 60- or 90-day pre-suit notice windows, Montana allows claims against governmental entities within the same three-year SOL, with no separate short-fuse notice deadline. However, the claim must be formally presented to the appropriate government entity before filing suit. An attorney familiar with Montana's Government Claims procedure must handle this correctly — presenting the claim to the wrong entity or in the wrong form can create procedural defects that delay or bar the government-entity portion of the recovery.
Legal Information Notice
The legal information on this page is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change, and every case is different. Always consult with a licensed attorney in your state to verify the current law and how it applies to your specific situation.
Montana Code Annotated § 69-14-1004 requires first-dollar primary TNC coverage starting in Period 1 — when the driver activates the app but has not yet accepted a ride. Most states allow a coverage gap during Period 1, leaving injured victims to fight through the driver's personal insurer (which often denies coverage based on commercial-use exclusions) before reaching TNC coverage. Montana eliminates this gap entirely: the moment a Montana driver turns on the Uber or Lyft app, the TNC's liability policy applies. During Periods 2 and 3, Montana requires the industry-standard $1,000,000 primary liability coverage. Source: Montana Legislature, https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0690/chapter_0140/part_0100/sections_index.html
MCA § 27-2-204 provides a three-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims. Unlike most states, Montana does not impose a separate short-fuse pre-suit notice requirement for government entity claims under MCA § 2-9-301 — the three-year window generally applies. However, the electronic evidence window is much shorter: GPS trip data, driver period logs, and in-app communications should be preserved via a formal litigation hold demand within days of the crash. Waiting even a few months risks permanent loss of the data needed to establish which coverage tier applied and how the crash occurred. Source: Montana Legislature, https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0270/chapter_0020/part_0020/section_0040/0270-0020-0020-0040.html
MCA § 27-1-702 applies the "not as great as" modified comparative fault standard. You recover only if your negligence is strictly less than the defendant's combined fault — at exactly 50%, you are barred from all recovery. This is harsher than Hawaii's 51% bar, where 50% still allows recovery. Montana rideshare defense teams use this threshold aggressively, arguing that a passenger failed to account for traffic conditions or that a pedestrian stepped outside a marked crossing. An independent accident reconstruction retained early, before Uber or Lyft's adjusters have documented the scene, is the most reliable tool for keeping the fault calculation below the bar. Source: Montana Legislature, https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0270/chapter_0010/part_0070/section_0020/0270-0010-0070-0020.html
Direct liability claims against the TNC platform face the 47 U.S.C. § 230 defense in some contexts, but Montana courts apply traditional negligence principles to platform conduct separate from content moderation. Montana TNC law under MCA §§ 69-14-1001 through 69-14-1011 imposes direct regulatory obligations on TNCs — including driver background check requirements, vehicle inspection standards, and insurance mandates. Failure to comply with these regulatory duties creates independent TNC liability separate from driver negligence. Montana's first-dollar Period 1 coverage requirement also means that the TNC's insurer is always the primary point of contact regardless of which period the driver was in.
Montana's first-dollar Period 1 coverage under MCA § 69-14-1004 eliminates the coverage gap most states allow during this period. If the driver had the app active — even without an accepted ride — the TNC's liability policy applies from dollar one. Coverage floors during Period 1 are lower than during Periods 2-3 (where $1,000,000 applies), but Montana requires specific minimum Period 1 coverage rather than leaving the injured victim to fight through the driver's personal insurance. If the driver's app was completely closed, the TNC carries no coverage obligation and only the driver's personal insurance applies. The app-active status at the exact moment of impact is determined from Uber or Lyft's timestamped records, which must be preserved immediately.
All legal information on this page is sourced from primary government statutes. Last verified 2026-04-07.
In-depth articles relevant to your rideshare accident lawyer case.
Uber or Lyft Accident: What to Do and Who Pays
Injured in an Uber or Lyft accident? Learn who is liable, what insurance covers your claim, and steps to protect your rights.
How to Deal With Insurance Companies After an Accident (2026 Guide)
Learn how to deal with insurance adjusters after an accident. Avoid common traps, protect your claim, and maximize your settlement.
How Long Does a Personal Injury Case Take? (2026 Timeline)
Understand the typical timeline of a personal injury case from filing to settlement. Learn what factors speed up or delay your claim.
Different type of accident? We connect victims with attorneys across all six practice areas.
Collected by partner attorneys for injured clients. California and Pennsylvania reviews prioritized.
“After my crash, I did not know whether to talk to the insurance company first or get treatment documented. The attorney explained the timeline and what evidence mattered.”
— California accident review, Los Angeles, CA
“I did not understand Pennsylvania limited tort or why the adjuster kept asking about my policy. Getting matched with someone local helped me know what questions to ask.”
— Pennsylvania accident review, Philadelphia, PA
Informational only. GetAccidentLawyerNow is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Every case is unique.
Don't wait. The 3 years statute of limitations is ticking.
Call (267) 212-1034 Now*Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.