Michigan's no-fault reform (2019 PA 21) dramatically changed how rideshare passengers access PIP medical benefits — post-reform, passengers look to their own no-fault policy first under MCL 500.3114, not the TNC's insurer — making the injured passenger's own PIP tier election and the existence of Michigan Assigned Claims Plan coverage the first two questions in any Detroit or Grand Rapids rideshare case.
Michigan's TNC framework is codified at MCL 257.2101 et seq. (Limousine, Taxicab, and Transportation Network Company Act, Act 345 of 2016), regulated by the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA). The insurance structure follows the standard three-period model: Period 1 (app on, no ride) requires $50,000/$100,000 bodily injury / $25,000 property damage plus PIP; Period 2-3 (accepted through drop-off) requires $1,000,000 CSL. What makes Michigan distinctive is the no-fault PIP priority analysis. Pre-2019 reform, the TNC's insurer often paid PIP first; post-2019 PA 21, rideshare passengers access PIP from their own no-fault policy first (MCL 500.3114). Passengers without their own Michigan no-fault policy look next to the vehicle owner's policy, then the driver's policy, then the Michigan Assigned Claims Plan (MACP). The MACP has its own notice requirements and caps. MCL 257.2107 requires annual criminal background checks and driving history reviews; MCL 257.2109 requires annual vehicle safety inspections for vehicles five years or older. Detroit's downtown, Midtown, Corktown, and Detroit Metropolitan Airport (DTW) staging areas generate the highest rideshare crash volume in Michigan.
Michigan's three-year personal injury statute of limitations under MCL 600.5805(2) governs rideshare crash tort claims. But the PIP benefit notice deadline under MCL 500.3145 — one year from the crash — is the more urgent deadline for first-party medical expense recovery. In a rideshare crash, the PIP priority analysis under MCL 500.3114 must be completed within the first weeks of the crash: identify whether the passenger has their own Michigan no-fault policy and what tier it covers, then determine whether the TNC's insurer is a secondary or primary PIP source, and whether the MACP applies. An attorney retained immediately after the crash completes the PIP priority analysis, notifies the correct PIP insurer in writing within the first weeks, and begins building the MCL 500.3135 serious impairment case simultaneously.
Michigan's 2019 PA 21 no-fault reform created tiered PIP elections under MCL 500.3107c — $50,000 (Medicaid only), $250,000, $500,000, or unlimited medical coverage. For rideshare passengers, the relevant tier is the passenger's own no-fault policy's PIP election (post-2019). A passenger who elected $50,000 Medicaid-only PIP and suffered catastrophic injuries in an Uber or Lyft crash may exhaust their PIP coverage in days. After PIP exhaustion, the tort claim against the TNC's $1,000,000 Period 2-3 policy requires meeting the MCL 500.3135 serious impairment threshold — demonstrating "serious impairment of body function" per McCormick v. Carrier, 487 Mich. 180 (2010). Death automatically satisfies the threshold. An attorney documents the impact on daily activities from the first medical contact to build the serious impairment record.
MCL 257.2107 requires Michigan TNCs to conduct annual criminal background checks and driving history reviews for all drivers. MCL 257.2109 requires annual vehicle safety inspections for vehicles five years of age or older — a requirement absent in many other states' TNC statutes. If a Michigan TNC driver had a disqualifying criminal record that the annual background check should have caught, or if the vehicle failed or never received its required annual safety inspection, the TNC faces direct negligence claims for negligent driver vetting and negligent vehicle inspection. These records are not public, but they are discoverable through LARA and by subpoena in litigation. An attorney requests the driver's TNC enrollment and background check history and the vehicle's inspection record as the first discovery targets.
Michigan's highway-defect government claims add a separate track in rideshare accidents involving road conditions on Michigan streets or state trunklines. The Governmental Tort Liability Act's 120-day notice requirement under MCL 691.1404 applies to highway-defect claims — the most compressed government claim notice window in Michigan law. For crashes at DTW staging areas, Wayne County Airport Authority has its own claims process and insurance. An attorney conducts a full venue audit within the first days of engagement: TNC insurer, government road-defect exposure with 120-day notice, MACP eligibility, and the driver's personal insurer — simultaneously, not as sequential steps.
Legal Information Notice
The legal information on this page is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change, and every case is different. Always consult with a licensed attorney in your state to verify the current law and how it applies to your specific situation.
Post-2019 PA 21, rideshare passengers access PIP medical benefits from their own no-fault policy first (MCL 500.3114). If the passenger has no Michigan no-fault policy, they look to the vehicle owner's policy, then the driver's policy, then the Michigan Assigned Claims Plan (MACP). The TNC's $1,000,000 Period 2-3 liability policy covers tort claims for pain and suffering and economic losses above PIP, but only after crossing the MCL 500.3135 serious impairment threshold. One year from the crash is the PIP benefit notice deadline under MCL 500.3145 — missing it bars PIP recovery regardless of the three-year tort SOL.
Under MCL 257.2101 et seq. (Act 345 of 2016): Period 1 (app on, no ride accepted) requires $50,000/$100,000 bodily injury, $25,000 PD, plus PIP. Periods 2-3 (ride accepted through drop-off) require $1,000,000 CSL. PIP coverage priority is governed by MCL 500.3114 — passengers look to their own policy first post-2019 reform. The MACP covers passengers who are uninsured or whose vehicle is uninsured when all other PIP sources are exhausted.
Yes, through direct negligence theories. MCL 257.2107 requires annual background checks and driving history reviews — if a disqualified driver was permitted to remain active on the platform, negligent retention is viable. MCL 257.2109 requires annual vehicle safety inspections for vehicles 5+ years old — if an uninspected vehicle's defect contributed to the crash, the TNC faces direct negligence. The independent contractor classification under MCL 257.2102 limits vicarious liability but does not eliminate direct negligence claims. Background check records and vehicle inspection records are discoverable through LARA and by litigation subpoena.
Three years from the date of the crash for the tort claim under MCL 600.5805(2). One year from the crash for PIP benefit notice under MCL 500.3145 — this is the operative urgent deadline for first-party medical expense recovery and must be met regardless of the tort SOL. For highway-defect government claims, 120-day written notice under MCL 691.1404 is required — the most compressed government claim deadline in Michigan law.
MCL 257.2107 requires TNCs to conduct annual criminal background checks and driving history reviews for all active drivers. If a driver had a disqualifying criminal conviction and the annual review failed to catch it — or the TNC failed to deactivate the driver after the review — the platform faces direct liability for negligent retention. The TNC driver enrollment records and background check results are not public records but are fully discoverable in litigation. An attorney issues a targeted subpoena to LARA and the TNC within the first days of engagement.
All legal information on this page is sourced from primary government statutes. Last verified 2026-04-07.
MCL 257.2101 et seq.
Michigan TNC Act (Act 345 of 2016)
MCL 257.2107
Michigan TNC driver background check requirements
MCL 257.2109
Michigan TNC vehicle safety inspection requirements
MCL 500.3114
TNC passengers
MCL 500.3107c
Michigan PIP coverage tiers (post-2019 reform)
2019 PA 21 (MCL 500.3101 amended)
PIP tier elections
In-depth articles relevant to your rideshare accident lawyer case.
Uber or Lyft Accident: What to Do and Who Pays
Injured in an Uber or Lyft accident? Learn who is liable, what insurance covers your claim, and steps to protect your rights.
How to Deal With Insurance Companies After an Accident (2026 Guide)
Learn how to deal with insurance adjusters after an accident. Avoid common traps, protect your claim, and maximize your settlement.
How Long Does a Personal Injury Case Take? (2026 Timeline)
Understand the typical timeline of a personal injury case from filing to settlement. Learn what factors speed up or delay your claim.
Different type of accident? We connect victims with attorneys across all six practice areas.
Collected by partner attorneys for injured clients. California and Pennsylvania reviews prioritized.
“After my crash, I did not know whether to talk to the insurance company first or get treatment documented. The attorney explained the timeline and what evidence mattered.”
— California accident review, Los Angeles, CA
“I did not understand Pennsylvania limited tort or why the adjuster kept asking about my policy. Getting matched with someone local helped me know what questions to ask.”
— Pennsylvania accident review, Philadelphia, PA
Informational only. GetAccidentLawyerNow is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Every case is unique.
Don't wait. The 3 years statute of limitations is ticking.
Call (267) 212-1034 Now*Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.