Indiana's TNC statute at Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-4 statutorily classifies TNC drivers as independent contractors — foreclosing the primary vicarious liability theory — while § 8-2.1-19.1-10 permits personal auto insurers to exclude TNC-period coverage, making the TNC's tiered commercial policy the primary recovery source for injured passengers.
Indiana's TNC framework under Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1 requires TNCs to register with the Indiana Department of Revenue and maintain tiered insurance coverage. Period 1 (driver logged in, no ride accepted): $50,000/$100,000/$25,000 primary liability plus UM/UIM under § 8-2.1-19.1-8. Periods 2-3 (from ride acceptance through completion): $1,000,000 CSL primary. Indiana's statutory IC classification under § 8-2.1-19.1-4 forecloses the vicarious liability theory against the TNC for the driver's negligence. Personal auto insurers may exclude TNC-period coverage under § 8-2.1-19.1-10, but a gap coverage rule requires the TNC's commercial policy to cover from the first dollar if the personal policy lapses or denies. Indiana is a traditional fault state with no PIP — the tort pathway has no threshold to clear.
Indiana's two-year personal injury SOL under Ind. Code § 34-11-2-4 applies to rideshare accident claims. The filing deadline is not the primary urgency — Period determination is. The insurance tier that applies turns entirely on the driver's status at the moment of the crash: Period 1 (app on, no ride accepted) provides $50,000/$100,000/$25,000 plus UM/UIM under § 8-2.1-19.1-8; Periods 2-3 (ride accepted through completion) provide $1,000,000 CSL primary. The difference is $950,000 per incident. Trip logs, GPS records, and app dispatch data must be preserved immediately — TNC platforms purge data on rolling schedules — and these records are the primary evidence for any coverage-tier dispute.
Indiana Code § 8-2.1-19.1-4 provides that a TNC does not control, direct, or manage a TNC driver who connects to the TNC's digital platform, and classifies TNC drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. This statutory IC classification forecloses the primary vicarious liability theory against the TNC for the driver's negligence. However, IC classification does not eliminate all TNC liability paths. The TNC's own direct duties in driver screening — background checks, driving record verification, vehicle safety inspection requirements under § 8-2.1-19.1 — remain as a direct negligence theory if screening failures contributed to the crash. An attorney evaluates both pathways: the statutory insurance tiers (the primary recovery track) and the direct-duty theory against the TNC.
Indiana Code § 8-2.1-19.1-10 permits personal auto insurers to exclude coverage during TNC periods — meaning a rideshare driver's personal policy may deny coverage for a crash that occurred while logged into the app. The gap coverage rule in Indiana's TNC statute addresses this: if the driver's personal policy lapses or denies coverage during Periods 1, 2, or 3, the TNC's commercial policy must provide coverage beginning with the first dollar of the claim. In practice, this means that when a personal policy denies — which is common for TNC-period crashes — the TNC's commercial policy becomes the primary payer. An attorney confirms the personal policy's TNC exclusion, verifies which Period was active at impact, and positions the TNC's commercial policy as the primary recovery source.
Indiana's 51% comparative fault bar under § 34-51-2-6 applies to rideshare accident claims. Passengers in rideshare vehicles are almost never found at fault, but the TNC and any at-fault third-party driver will each attempt to push fault onto the other, and coverage disputes between the personal insurer and the TNC can slow resolution of victim claims. For crashes occurring on Indiana government roads — I-65 through downtown Indianapolis, I-70 eastbound, county highway infrastructure — the Indiana Tort Claims Act under § 34-13-3-8 requires written notice to the appropriate political subdivision within 180 days of the date of loss if a road defect contributed. ITCA damages are capped at $700,000 per person under § 34-13-3-4 for government defendants.
Legal Information Notice
The legal information on this page is for general educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Laws change, and every case is different. Always consult with a licensed attorney in your state to verify the current law and how it applies to your specific situation.
Under Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-8, coverage depends on the driver's status at the moment of the crash. Period 1 (app on, no ride accepted): $50,000 per person / $100,000 per incident bodily injury / $25,000 property damage primary liability, plus UM/UIM. Periods 2-3 (from ride acceptance through completion): $1,000,000 CSL primary liability. Trip logs and GPS data from the TNC establish which Period was active and are the critical evidence for coverage-tier disputes.
Two years from the date the cause of action accrues under Ind. Code § 34-11-2-4. For government road defect claims, the Indiana Tort Claims Act under § 34-13-3-8 requires written notice to the appropriate political subdivision within 180 days of the date of loss, with ITCA damages capped at $700,000 per person under § 34-13-3-4. Indiana is a fault-liability state with no PIP — the tort recovery pathway has no threshold to clear.
Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-4 statutorily classifies TNC drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, providing that the TNC does not control, direct, or manage the driver. This classification forecloses the primary vicarious liability theory against Uber or Lyft for the driver's negligence. However, the TNC's direct duties in driver screening, background checks, and vehicle safety requirements remain available as a direct-negligence theory if vetting failures contributed to the crash — independent of the IC classification.
The vicarious liability theory is foreclosed by Indiana's statutory IC classification under § 8-2.1-19.1-4. But the TNC's own duties in driver screening and vehicle inspection under § 8-2.1-19.1 create a direct-negligence pathway if the TNC's vetting failures contributed to the crash. An attorney evaluates both tracks — the statutory insurance tiers and the direct-duty theory — to maximize available recovery for the injured passenger.
Personal auto policies may exclude TNC-period coverage under Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-10. When the driver's personal policy denies, Indiana's gap coverage rule requires the TNC's commercial policy to provide coverage from the first dollar of the claim. During Periods 2-3, the TNC's $1,000,000 CSL primary policy is available. An attorney verifies the Period status using trip logs and GPS data, confirms which policy layer is primary, and pursues every available coverage source including the victim's own UM/UIM coverage.
All legal information on this page is sourced from primary government statutes. Last verified 2026-04-07.
Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-8
Period 1 ($50k/$100k/$25-50k) and Period 2 ($1M CSL)
Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-4
TNC drivers classified as independent contractors
Ind. Code § 8-2.1-19.1-10
Personal auto insurer exclusions during TNC periods permitted
Indiana DOR — TNC Information
DOR TNC permit and insurance filing info (PDF)
In-depth articles relevant to your rideshare accident lawyer case.
Uber or Lyft Accident: What to Do and Who Pays
Injured in an Uber or Lyft accident? Learn who is liable, what insurance covers your claim, and steps to protect your rights.
How to Deal With Insurance Companies After an Accident (2026 Guide)
Learn how to deal with insurance adjusters after an accident. Avoid common traps, protect your claim, and maximize your settlement.
How Long Does a Personal Injury Case Take? (2026 Timeline)
Understand the typical timeline of a personal injury case from filing to settlement. Learn what factors speed up or delay your claim.
Different type of accident? We connect victims with attorneys across all six practice areas.
Collected by partner attorneys for injured clients. California and Pennsylvania reviews prioritized.
“After my crash, I did not know whether to talk to the insurance company first or get treatment documented. The attorney explained the timeline and what evidence mattered.”
— California accident review, Los Angeles, CA
“I did not understand Pennsylvania limited tort or why the adjuster kept asking about my policy. Getting matched with someone local helped me know what questions to ask.”
— Pennsylvania accident review, Philadelphia, PA
Informational only. GetAccidentLawyerNow is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Every case is unique.
Don't wait. The 2 years statute of limitations is ticking.
Call (267) 212-1034 Now*Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique.